Browse Source

fix in counterexamples for lower bounds that was recently introduced

tempestpy_adaptions
Sebastian Junges 6 years ago
parent
commit
ac9d9d6778
  1. 5
      src/storm-counterexamples/counterexamples/SMTMinimalLabelSetGenerator.h

5
src/storm-counterexamples/counterexamples/SMTMinimalLabelSetGenerator.h

@ -2004,8 +2004,8 @@ namespace storm {
result.psiStates = subQualitativeResult.getTruthValuesVector();
}
bool lowerBoundedFormula = false;
if (storm::logic::isLowerBound(result.comparisonType)) {
STORM_LOG_DEBUG("Computing counterexample for a lowerbound.");
// If the formula specifies a lower bound, we need to modify the phi and psi states.
// More concretely, we convert P(min)>lambda(F psi) to P(max)<(1-lambda)(G !psi) = P(max)<(1-lambda)(!psi U prob0E(psi))
// where prob0E(psi) is the set of states for which there exists a strategy \sigma_0 that avoids
@ -2027,7 +2027,7 @@ namespace storm {
// Remember our transformation so we can add commands to guarantee that the prob0E(a) states actually
// have a strategy that voids a states.
lowerBoundedFormula = true;
result.lowerBoundedFormula = true;
}
return result;
@ -2053,6 +2053,7 @@ namespace storm {
// Extend the command set properly.
for (auto& labelSet : labelSets) {
if (counterexInput.lowerBoundedFormula) {
STORM_LOG_DEBUG("Extending the counterexample due to lower bound computation.");
extendLabelSetLowerBound(model, labelSet, counterexInput.phiStates, counterexInput.psiStates, options.silent);
}
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save