Browse Source

introduced shield export

Still needs a proper naming convention for the shields to be unique
tempestpy_adaptions
Stefan Pranger 4 years ago
parent
commit
3decad58b9
  1. 25
      src/storm/shields/shield-handling.h

25
src/storm/shields/shield-handling.h

@ -11,22 +11,39 @@
#include "storm/shields/AbstractShield.h" #include "storm/shields/AbstractShield.h"
#include "storm/shields/PreSafetyShield.h" #include "storm/shields/PreSafetyShield.h"
#include "storm/shields/PostSafetyShield.h"
#include "storm/io/file.h"
#include "storm/utility/macros.h"
#include "storm/exceptions/InvalidArgumentException.h" #include "storm/exceptions/InvalidArgumentException.h"
namespace tempest { namespace tempest {
namespace shields { namespace shields {
std::string shieldFilename(std::shared_ptr<storm::logic::ShieldExpression const> const& shieldingExpression) {
std::stringstream filename;
filename << shieldingExpression->typeToString() << "_";
filename << shieldingExpression->comparisonToString();
filename << shieldingExpression->getValue() << ".shield";
return filename.str();
}
template<typename ValueType, typename IndexType = storm::storage::sparse::state_type> template<typename ValueType, typename IndexType = storm::storage::sparse::state_type>
storm::storage::Scheduler<ValueType> createShield(std::vector<IndexType> const& rowGroupIndices, std::vector<ValueType> const& choiceValues, std::shared_ptr<storm::logic::ShieldExpression const> const& shieldingExpression, storm::storage::BitVector relevantStates, boost::optional<storm::storage::BitVector> coalitionStates) {
void createShield(std::shared_ptr<storm::models::sparse::Model<ValueType>> model, std::vector<ValueType> const& choiceValues, std::shared_ptr<storm::logic::ShieldExpression const> const& shieldingExpression, storm::storage::BitVector relevantStates, boost::optional<storm::storage::BitVector> coalitionStates) {
std::ofstream stream;
storm::utility::openFile(shieldFilename(shieldingExpression), stream);
if(shieldingExpression->isPreSafetyShield()) { if(shieldingExpression->isPreSafetyShield()) {
PreSafetyShield<ValueType, IndexType> shield(rowGroupIndices, choiceValues, shieldingExpression, relevantStates, coalitionStates);
return shield.construct();
PreSafetyShield<ValueType, IndexType> shield(model->getTransitionMatrix().getRowGroupIndices(), choiceValues, shieldingExpression, relevantStates, coalitionStates);
shield.construct().printToStream(stream, model);
} else if(shieldingExpression->isPostSafetyShield()) { } else if(shieldingExpression->isPostSafetyShield()) {
STORM_LOG_THROW(false, storm::exceptions::InvalidArgumentException, "Cannot create post safety shields yet");
PostSafetyShield<ValueType, IndexType> shield(model->getTransitionMatrix().getRowGroupIndices(), choiceValues, shieldingExpression, relevantStates, coalitionStates);
shield.construct().printToStream(stream, model);
} else if(shieldingExpression->isOptimalShield()) { } else if(shieldingExpression->isOptimalShield()) {
storm::utility::closeFile(stream);
STORM_LOG_THROW(false, storm::exceptions::InvalidArgumentException, "Cannot create optimal shields yet"); STORM_LOG_THROW(false, storm::exceptions::InvalidArgumentException, "Cannot create optimal shields yet");
} }
storm::utility::closeFile(stream);
} }
} }
} }
Loading…
Cancel
Save