You can not select more than 25 topics
			Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
			
				
					
					
						
							1020 lines
						
					
					
						
							31 KiB
						
					
					
				
			
		
		
		
			
			
			
				
					
				
				
					
				
			
		
		
	
	
							1020 lines
						
					
					
						
							31 KiB
						
					
					
				| // Copyright 2005, Google Inc. | |
| // All rights reserved. | |
| // | |
| // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without | |
| // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are | |
| // met: | |
| // | |
| //     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright | |
| // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. | |
| //     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above | |
| // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer | |
| // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the | |
| // distribution. | |
| //     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its | |
| // contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from | |
| // this software without specific prior written permission. | |
| // | |
| // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS | |
| // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT | |
| // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR | |
| // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT | |
| // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, | |
| // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT | |
| // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, | |
| // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY | |
| // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT | |
| // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE | |
| // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. | |
| // | |
| // A unit test for Google Test itself.  This verifies that the basic | |
| // constructs of Google Test work. | |
| // | |
| // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) | |
|  | |
| #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" | |
| #include "gtest/gtest.h" | |
|  | |
| // Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's | |
| // implementation.  It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is | |
| // included, or there will be a compiler error.  This trick is to | |
| // prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in | |
| // his code. | |
| #define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 | |
| #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" | |
| #undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ | |
|  | |
| #include <stdlib.h> | |
|  | |
| #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE | |
| using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter; | |
| using testing::TestPartResultArray; | |
| 
 | |
| using testing::internal::Notification; | |
| using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam; | |
| #endif | |
|  | |
| namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix; | |
| using testing::internal::String; | |
| using testing::internal::scoped_ptr; | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests catching fatal failures. | |
|  | |
| // A subroutine used by the following test. | |
| void TestEq1(int x) { | |
|   ASSERT_EQ(1, x); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it | |
| // generates, and then returns early. | |
| void TryTestSubroutine() { | |
|   // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. | |
|   TestEq1(2); | |
| 
 | |
|   // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. | |
|   // | |
|   // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling | |
|   // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture. | |
|   if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return; | |
| 
 | |
|   // If we get here, something is wrong. | |
|   FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) { | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) { | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the | |
| // failing test summary. | |
| class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {}; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) { | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print | |
| // its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests. | |
| INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams, | |
|                         FailingParamTest, | |
|                         testing::Values(2)); | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine. | |
| TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   TryTestSubroutine(); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine. | |
| TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. | |
|   TryTestSubroutine(); | |
| 
 | |
|   // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. | |
|   // | |
|   // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test | |
|   // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed. | |
|   if (HasFatalFailure()) return; | |
| 
 | |
|   // If we get here, something is wrong. | |
|   FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check. | |
| TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_TRUE(false);  // Generates a nonfatal failure | |
|   ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure());  // This should succeed. | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions. | |
| TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) { | |
|   static const int a[4] = { | |
|     3, 9, 2, 6 | |
|   }; | |
| 
 | |
|   printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n"); | |
|   for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) { | |
|     printf("i == %d\n", i); | |
|     EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]); | |
|   } | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro. | |
|  | |
| // A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. | |
| void SubWithoutTrace(int n) { | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(1, n); | |
|   ASSERT_EQ(2, n); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. | |
| void SubWithTrace(int n) { | |
|   SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n); | |
| 
 | |
|   SubWithoutTrace(n); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes. | |
| TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) { | |
|   printf("(expected to fail)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked. | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; | |
| 
 | |
|   { | |
|     SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace"); | |
|     // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain | |
|     // the trace. | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there | |
|   // should be no trace again. | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop. | |
| TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) { | |
|   printf("(expected to fail)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) { | |
|     SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i); | |
| 
 | |
|     SubWithoutTrace(i); | |
|   } | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine. | |
| TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) { | |
|   printf("(expected to fail)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   SubWithTrace(1); | |
|   SubWithTrace(2); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested. | |
| TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) { | |
|   printf("(expected to fail)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   SCOPED_TRACE("");  // A trace without a message. | |
|  | |
|   SubWithTrace(2); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope. | |
| TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) { | |
|   printf("(expected to fail)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   SCOPED_TRACE("A"); | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() | |
|       << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A."; | |
| 
 | |
|   SCOPED_TRACE("B"); | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() | |
|       << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B."; | |
| 
 | |
|   { | |
|     SCOPED_TRACE("C"); | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain " | |
|                   << "trace point A, B, and C."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   SCOPED_TRACE("D"); | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain " | |
|                 << "trace point A, B, and D."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE | |
| // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple | |
| // threads.  Namely, an assertion should be affected by | |
| // SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only. | |
|  | |
| // Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test: | |
| // | |
| //   Thread A (main)                | Thread B (spawned) | |
| //   ===============================|================================ | |
| //   spawns thread B                | | |
| //   -------------------------------+-------------------------------- | |
| //   waits for n1                   | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); | |
| //                                  | generates failure #1 | |
| //                                  | notifies n1 | |
| //   -------------------------------+-------------------------------- | |
| //   SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");       | waits for n2 | |
| //   generates failure #2           | | |
| //   notifies n2                    | | |
| //   -------------------------------|-------------------------------- | |
| //   waits for n3                   | generates failure #3 | |
| //                                  | trace B dies | |
| //                                  | generates failure #4 | |
| //                                  | notifies n3 | |
| //   -------------------------------|-------------------------------- | |
| //   generates failure #5           | finishes | |
| //   trace A dies                   | | |
| //   generates failure #6           | | |
| //   -------------------------------|-------------------------------- | |
| //   waits for thread B to finish   | | |
|  | |
| struct CheckPoints { | |
|   Notification n1; | |
|   Notification n2; | |
|   Notification n3; | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) { | |
|   { | |
|     SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() | |
|         << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive)."; | |
|     check_points->n1.Notify(); | |
|     check_points->n2.WaitForNotification(); | |
| 
 | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() | |
|         << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive)."; | |
|   }  // Trace B dies here. | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() | |
|       << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive)."; | |
|   check_points->n3.Notify(); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) { | |
|   printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n"); | |
| 
 | |
|   CheckPoints check_points; | |
|   ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace, | |
|                                        &check_points, | |
|                                        NULL); | |
|   check_points.n1.WaitForNotification(); | |
| 
 | |
|   { | |
|     SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() | |
|         << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive)."; | |
|     check_points.n2.Notify(); | |
|     check_points.n3.WaitForNotification(); | |
| 
 | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() | |
|         << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive)."; | |
|   }  // Trace A dies here. | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() | |
|       << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive)."; | |
|   thread.Join(); | |
| } | |
| #endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE | |
|  | |
| TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest, | |
|      DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) { | |
|   // This test body is intentionally empty.  Its sole purpose is for | |
|   // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag | |
|   // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of | |
|   // the test output. | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F. | |
| // | |
| // This function creates two failures intentionally. | |
| void AdHocTest() { | |
|   printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_TRUE(false); | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(2, 3); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test. | |
| int RunAllTests() { | |
|   AdHocTest(); | |
|   return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor. | |
| class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { | |
|  protected: | |
|   NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { | |
|     printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n"); | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void SetUp() { | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp()."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void TearDown() { | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown."; | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor. | |
| class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { | |
|  protected: | |
|   FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { | |
|     printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); | |
|     Init(); | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void SetUp() { | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp().  " | |
|                   << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " | |
|                   << "had a fatal failure."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void TearDown() { | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown().  " | |
|                   << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " | |
|                   << "had a fatal failure."; | |
|   } | |
|  private: | |
|   void Init() { | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { | |
|   ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body.  " | |
|                 << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " | |
|                 << "had a fatal failure."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp(). | |
| class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { | |
|  protected: | |
|   virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() { | |
|     Deinit(); | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void SetUp() { | |
|     printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n"); | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void TearDown() { | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown()."; | |
|   } | |
|  private: | |
|   void Deinit() { | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor."; | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { | |
|   FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests fatal failures in SetUp(). | |
| class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { | |
|  protected: | |
|   virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() { | |
|     Deinit(); | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void SetUp() { | |
|     printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n"); | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void TearDown() { | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown()."; | |
|   } | |
|  private: | |
|   void Deinit() { | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor."; | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { | |
|   FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function.  " | |
|          << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) { | |
|   ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc"; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE | |
|  | |
| // A unary function that may die. | |
| void DieIf(bool should_die) { | |
|   GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf()."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context. | |
|  | |
| // Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread. | |
| struct SpawnThreadNotifications { | |
|   SpawnThreadNotifications() {} | |
| 
 | |
|   Notification spawn_thread_started; | |
|   Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate; | |
| 
 | |
|  private: | |
|   GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications); | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| // The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the | |
| // MultipleThreads test (below). | |
| static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) { | |
|   // Signals the main thread that this thread has started. | |
|   notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify(); | |
| 
 | |
|   // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread. | |
|   notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification(); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest | |
| // suffix.  It starts threads which might interfere with later | |
| // death tests, so it must run after all other death tests. | |
| class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test { | |
|  protected: | |
|   // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin. | |
|   virtual void SetUp() { | |
|     thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>( | |
|         &ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL)); | |
|     notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification(); | |
|   } | |
|   // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it. | |
|   // Depending on the version of the thread library in use, | |
|   // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere | |
|   // with later death tests.  This is unfortunate, but this class | |
|   // cleans up after itself as best it can. | |
|   virtual void TearDown() { | |
|     notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify(); | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|  private: | |
|   SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_; | |
|   scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_; | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| #endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE | |
|  | |
| // The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a | |
| // test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in | |
| // the same test case use.  It deliberately contains two fixture | |
| // classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces. | |
|  | |
| // The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that | |
| // when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND | |
| // same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will | |
| // fail. | |
|  | |
| namespace foo { | |
| 
 | |
| class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} | |
| TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} | |
| 
 | |
| class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, | |
|        TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} | |
| 
 | |
| }  // namespace foo | |
|  | |
| namespace bar { | |
| 
 | |
| class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| // The following two tests are expected to fail.  We rely on the | |
| // golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message. | |
| TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {} | |
| TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {} | |
| 
 | |
| class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| // Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test | |
| // generates the right error message. | |
| TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, | |
|        TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} | |
| 
 | |
| }  // namespace bar | |
|  | |
| // The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user | |
| // error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case.  The first | |
| // test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and | |
| // the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F. | |
|  | |
| class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {} | |
| 
 | |
| // Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test | |
| // generates the right error message. | |
| TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {} | |
| 
 | |
| class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {} | |
| 
 | |
| // Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test | |
| // generates the right error message. | |
| TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) { | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(). | |
| int global_integer = 0; | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { | |
|   global_integer = 0; | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; | |
|   }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables | |
| // (static or not). | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) { | |
|   int m = 0; | |
|   static int n; | |
|   n = 1; | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; | |
|   }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly | |
| // one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure. | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; | |
|   }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no | |
| // non-fatal failure. | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two | |
| // non-fatal failures. | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1."; | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2."; | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal | |
| // failure. | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being | |
| // tested returns. | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     return; | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS | |
|  | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being | |
| // tested throws. | |
| TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   try { | |
|     EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|       throw 0; | |
|     }, ""); | |
|   } catch(int) {  // NOLINT | |
|   } | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS | |
|  | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { | |
|   global_integer = 0; | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure."; | |
|   }, "Expected fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static | |
| // variables. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) { | |
|   static int n; | |
|   n = 1; | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure."; | |
|   }, "Expected fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly | |
| // one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; | |
|   }, "Expected fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal | |
| // failure. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // A helper for generating a fatal failure. | |
| void FatalFailure() { | |
|   FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two | |
| // fatal failures. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     FatalFailure(); | |
|     FatalFailure(); | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal | |
| // failure. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being | |
| // tested returns. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|     return; | |
|   }, ""); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS | |
|  | |
| // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being | |
| // tested throws. | |
| TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { | |
|   printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); | |
|   try { | |
|     EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ | |
|       throw 0; | |
|     }, ""); | |
|   } catch(int) {  // NOLINT | |
|   } | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS | |
|  | |
| // This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests. | |
| #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST | |
|  | |
| template <typename T> | |
| class TypedTest : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>); | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) { | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam()); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) { | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST | |
|  | |
| // This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests. | |
| #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P | |
|  | |
| template <typename T> | |
| class TypedTestP : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP); | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) { | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam()); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) { | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure); | |
| 
 | |
| typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes; | |
| INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes); | |
| 
 | |
| #endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P | |
|  | |
| #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST | |
|  | |
| // We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case | |
| // name ends with DeathTest are run first. | |
|  | |
| TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST | |
|  | |
| // We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test | |
| // case name ends with DeathTest are run first. | |
|  | |
| template <typename T> | |
| class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes; | |
| TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes); | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| # endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST | |
|  | |
| # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P | |
|  | |
| 
 | |
| // We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests | |
| // whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first. | |
|  | |
| template <typename T> | |
| class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test { | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest); | |
| 
 | |
| TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst); | |
| 
 | |
| INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes); | |
| 
 | |
| # endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P | |
|  | |
| #endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST | |
|  | |
| // Tests various failure conditions of | |
| // EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}. | |
| class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test { | |
|  public:  // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2. | |
|   enum FailureMode { | |
|     FATAL_FAILURE, | |
|     NONFATAL_FAILURE | |
|   }; | |
|   static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) { | |
|     if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) { | |
|       FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; | |
|     } else { | |
|       ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; | |
|     } | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { | |
|   // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); | |
|   // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal " | |
|                        "failure."); | |
|   // Wrong message. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure " | |
|                        "expected."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { | |
|   // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure."); | |
|   // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure."); | |
|   // Wrong message. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal " | |
|                           "failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE | |
|  | |
| class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest { | |
|  protected: | |
|   static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) { | |
|     ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL); | |
|     thread.Join(); | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { | |
|   // We only intercept the current thread. | |
|   printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE), | |
|                        "Expected fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { | |
|   // We only intercept the current thread. | |
|   printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE), | |
|                           "Expected non-fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest; | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from | |
| // the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD. | |
| TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) { | |
|   printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); | |
|   TestPartResultArray results; | |
|   { | |
|     ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter( | |
|         ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD, | |
|         &results); | |
|     AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE); | |
|     AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE); | |
|   } | |
|   // The two failures should not have been intercepted. | |
|   EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail."; | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| #endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE | |
|  | |
| TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { | |
|   // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); | |
|   // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), | |
|                                       "Expected non-fatal failure."); | |
|   // Wrong message. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), | |
|                                       "Some other fatal failure expected."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { | |
|   // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal " | |
|                                          "failure."); | |
|   // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), | |
|                                          "Expected fatal failure."); | |
|   // Wrong message. | |
|   printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); | |
|   EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), | |
|                                          "Some other non-fatal failure."); | |
| } | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(). | |
|  | |
| class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment { | |
|  public: | |
|   virtual void SetUp() { | |
|     printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void TearDown() { | |
|     printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); | |
|     FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment { | |
|  public: | |
|   virtual void SetUp() { | |
|     printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); | |
|   } | |
| 
 | |
|   virtual void TearDown() { | |
|     printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); | |
|     ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; | |
|   } | |
| }; | |
| 
 | |
| bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false; | |
| 
 | |
| // The main function. | |
| // | |
| // The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some | |
| // of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results | |
| // with the "golden" file. | |
| int main(int argc, char **argv) { | |
|   testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; | |
| 
 | |
|   // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail. | |
|   // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of | |
|   // this program with the golden file. | |
|  | |
|   // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many | |
|   // global side effects.  The following line serves as a sanity test | |
|   // for it. | |
|   testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); | |
|   if (argc >= 2 && | |
|       String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests") | |
|     GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true; | |
| 
 | |
| #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST | |
|   if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") { | |
|     // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child | |
|     // process of an threadsafe-style death test. | |
| # if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS | |
|     posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout); | |
| # else | |
|     posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout); | |
| # endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS | |
|     return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); | |
|   } | |
| #endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST | |
|  | |
|   if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests)) | |
|     return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); | |
| 
 | |
|   // Registers two global test environments. | |
|   // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they | |
|   // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order. | |
|   testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); | |
|   testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment); | |
| 
 | |
|   return RunAllTests(); | |
| }
 |