diff --git a/src/storage/MaximalEndComponentDecomposition.cpp b/src/storage/MaximalEndComponentDecomposition.cpp index f96857be3..af11768e3 100644 --- a/src/storage/MaximalEndComponentDecomposition.cpp +++ b/src/storage/MaximalEndComponentDecomposition.cpp @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ #include #include -#include #include "src/storage/MaximalEndComponentDecomposition.h" #include "src/storage/StronglyConnectedComponentDecomposition.h" @@ -57,7 +56,6 @@ namespace storm { endComponentStateSets.emplace_back(subsystem.begin(), subsystem.end()); storm::storage::BitVector statesToCheck(model.getNumberOfStates()); - std::cout << " starting... " << std::endl; // The iterator used here should really be a const_iterator. // However, gcc 4.8 (and assorted libraries) does not provide an erase(const_iterator) method for std::list // but only an erase(iterator). This is in compliance with the c++11 draft N3337, which specifies the change @@ -70,9 +68,7 @@ namespace storm { bool mecChanged = false; // Get an SCC decomposition of the current MEC candidate. - std::cout << "boom" << std::endl; StronglyConnectedComponentDecomposition sccs(model, mec, true); - std::cout << "boom1" << std::endl; // We need to do another iteration in case we have either more than once SCC or the SCC is smaller than // the MEC canditate itself. @@ -83,7 +79,6 @@ namespace storm { statesToCheck.set(scc.begin(), scc.end()); while (!statesToCheck.empty()) { - std::cout << "not empty!" << std::endl; storm::storage::BitVector statesToRemove(model.getNumberOfStates()); for (auto state : statesToCheck) { @@ -147,8 +142,6 @@ namespace storm { } // End of loop over all MEC candidates. - std::cout << " got here... " << std::endl; - // Now that we computed the underlying state sets of the MECs, we need to properly identify the choices // contained in the MEC and store them as actual MECs. this->blocks.reserve(endComponentStateSets.size());