You can not select more than 25 topics
			Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
			
				
					
					
						
							128 lines
						
					
					
						
							5.3 KiB
						
					
					
				
			
		
		
		
			
			
			
				
					
				
				
					
				
			
		
		
	
	
							128 lines
						
					
					
						
							5.3 KiB
						
					
					
				| 
 | |
| namespace Eigen { | |
| 
 | |
| /** \page TopicWritingEfficientProductExpression Writing efficient matrix product expressions | |
| 
 | |
| In general achieving good performance with Eigen does no require any special effort: | |
| simply write your expressions in the most high level way. This is especially true | |
| for small fixed size matrices. For large matrices, however, it might be useful to | |
| take some care when writing your expressions in order to minimize useless evaluations | |
| and optimize the performance. | |
| In this page we will give a brief overview of the Eigen's internal mechanism to simplify | |
| and evaluate complex product expressions, and discuss the current limitations. | |
| In particular we will focus on expressions matching level 2 and 3 BLAS routines, i.e, | |
| all kind of matrix products and triangular solvers. | |
| 
 | |
| Indeed, in Eigen we have implemented a set of highly optimized routines which are very similar | |
| to BLAS's ones. Unlike BLAS, those routines are made available to user via a high level and | |
| natural API. Each of these routines can compute in a single evaluation a wide variety of expressions. | |
| Given an expression, the challenge is then to map it to a minimal set of routines. | |
| As explained latter, this mechanism has some limitations, and knowing them will allow | |
| you to write faster code by making your expressions more Eigen friendly. | |
| 
 | |
| \section GEMM General Matrix-Matrix product (GEMM) | |
| 
 | |
| Let's start with the most common primitive: the matrix product of general dense matrices. | |
| In the BLAS world this corresponds to the GEMM routine. Our equivalent primitive can | |
| perform the following operation: | |
| \f$ C.noalias() += \alpha op1(A) op2(B) \f$ | |
| where A, B, and C are column and/or row major matrices (or sub-matrices), | |
| alpha is a scalar value, and op1, op2 can be transpose, adjoint, conjugate, or the identity. | |
| When Eigen detects a matrix product, it analyzes both sides of the product to extract a | |
| unique scalar factor alpha, and for each side, its effective storage order, shape, and conjugation states. | |
| More precisely each side is simplified by iteratively removing trivial expressions such as scalar multiple, | |
| negation and conjugation. Transpose and Block expressions are not evaluated and they only modify the storage order | |
| and shape. All other expressions are immediately evaluated. | |
| For instance, the following expression: | |
| \code m1.noalias() -= s4 * (s1 * m2.adjoint() * (-(s3*m3).conjugate()*s2))  \endcode | |
| is automatically simplified to: | |
| \code m1.noalias() += (s1*s2*conj(s3)*s4) * m2.adjoint() * m3.conjugate() \endcode | |
| which exactly matches our GEMM routine. | |
| 
 | |
| \subsection GEMM_Limitations Limitations | |
| Unfortunately, this simplification mechanism is not perfect yet and not all expressions which could be | |
| handled by a single GEMM-like call are correctly detected. | |
| <table class="manual" style="width:100%"> | |
| <tr> | |
| <th>Not optimal expression</th> | |
| <th>Evaluated as</th> | |
| <th>Optimal version (single evaluation)</th> | |
| <th>Comments</th> | |
| </tr> | |
| <tr> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1 += m2 * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| temp = m2 * m3; | |
| m1 += temp; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1.noalias() += m2 * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>Use .noalias() to tell Eigen the result and right-hand-sides do not alias.  | |
|     Otherwise the product m2 * m3 is evaluated into a temporary.</td> | |
| </tr> | |
| <tr class="alt"> | |
| <td></td> | |
| <td></td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1.noalias() += s1 * (m2 * m3); \endcode</td> | |
| <td>This is a special feature of Eigen. Here the product between a scalar | |
|     and a matrix product does not evaluate the matrix product but instead it | |
|     returns a matrix product expression tracking the scalar scaling factor. <br> | |
|     Without this optimization, the matrix product would be evaluated into a | |
|     temporary as in the next example.</td> | |
| </tr> | |
| <tr> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1.noalias() += (m2 * m3).adjoint(); \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| temp = m2 * m3; | |
| m1 += temp.adjoint(); \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1.noalias() += m3.adjoint() | |
| *              * m2.adjoint(); \endcode</td> | |
| <td>This is because the product expression has the EvalBeforeNesting bit which | |
|     enforces the evaluation of the product by the Tranpose expression.</td> | |
| </tr> | |
| <tr class="alt"> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1 = m1 + m2 * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| temp = m2 * m3; | |
| m1 = m1 + temp; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code m1.noalias() += m2 * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>Here there is no way to detect at compile time that the two m1 are the same, | |
|     and so the matrix product will be immediately evaluated.</td> | |
| </tr> | |
| <tr> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1.noalias() = m4 + m2 * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| temp = m2 * m3; | |
| m1 = m4 + temp; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1 = m4; | |
| m1.noalias() += m2 * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>First of all, here the .noalias() in the first expression is useless because | |
|     m2*m3 will be evaluated anyway. However, note how this expression can be rewritten | |
|     so that no temporary is required. (tip: for very small fixed size matrix | |
|     it is slighlty better to rewrite it like this: m1.noalias() = m2 * m3; m1 += m4;</td> | |
| </tr> | |
| <tr class="alt"> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1.noalias() += (s1*m2).block(..) * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| temp = (s1*m2).block(..); | |
| m1 += temp * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>\code | |
| m1.noalias() += s1 * m2.block(..) * m3; \endcode</td> | |
| <td>This is because our expression analyzer is currently not able to extract trivial | |
|     expressions nested in a Block expression. Therefore the nested scalar | |
|     multiple cannot be properly extracted.</td> | |
| </tr> | |
| </table> | |
| 
 | |
| Of course all these remarks hold for all other kind of products involving triangular or selfadjoint matrices. | |
| 
 | |
| */ | |
| 
 | |
| }
 |