@ -9,121 +9,129 @@
# include <storm/logic/Formula.h>
# include <storm/logic/Formula.h>
# include <storm/modelchecker/propositional/SparsePropositionalModelChecker.h>
# include <storm/modelchecker/propositional/SparsePropositionalModelChecker.h>
# include "storm/models/sparse/Model.h"
# include "storm/models/sparse/Model.h"
# include "storm/modelchecker/results/CheckResult.h"
# include "storm/modelchecker/results/ExplicitQualitativeCheckResult.h"
# include "storm/exceptions/NotImplementedException.h"
# include "storm/exceptions/NotImplementedException.h"
# include "storm/exceptions/NotSupportedException.h"
# include "storm/exceptions/NotSupportedException.h"
# include <set>
# include <set>
# include "storm/storage/BitVector.h"
# include "storm/utility/macros.h"
namespace storm {
namespace storm {
namespace analysis {
namespace analysis {
template < typename Value Type>
LatticeExtender < Value Type> : : LatticeExtender ( ) { //std::shared_ptr<storm::models::sparse::Dtmc<ValueType>> model) {
//TODO
template < typename SparseModel Type>
LatticeExtender < SparseModel Type> : : LatticeExtender ( std : : shared_ptr < SparseModelType > model ) : model ( model ) {
// intentionally left empty
}
}
// template <typename ValueType>
// storm::analysis::Lattice* LatticeExtender<ValueType>::toLattice(std::vector<std::shared_ptr<storm::logic::Formula const>> formulas) {
// STORM_LOG_THROW((++formulas.begin()) == formulas.end(), storm::exceptions::NotSupportedException, "Only one formula allowed for monotonicity analysis");
// STORM_LOG_THROW((*(formulas[0])).isProbabilityOperatorFormula()
// && ((*(formulas[0])).asProbabilityOperatorFormula().getSubformula().isUntilFormula()
// || (*(formulas[0])).asProbabilityOperatorFormula().getSubformula().isEventuallyFormula()), storm::exceptions::NotSupportedException, "Expecting until formula");
//
// uint_fast64_t numberOfStates = this->model.getNumberOfStates();
//
// storm::modelchecker::SparsePropositionalModelChecker<storm::models::sparse::Model<ValueType>> propositionalChecker(this->model);
// storm::storage::BitVector phiStates;
// storm::storage::BitVector psiStates;
// if ((*(formulas[0])).asProbabilityOperatorFormula().getSubformula().isUntilFormula()) {
// phiStates = propositionalChecker.check((*(formulas[0])).asProbabilityOperatorFormula().getSubformula().asUntilFormula().getLeftSubformula())->asExplicitQualitativeCheckResult().getTruthValuesVector();
// psiStates = propositionalChecker.check((*(formulas[0])).asProbabilityOperatorFormula().getSubformula().asUntilFormula().getRightSubformula())->asExplicitQualitativeCheckResult().getTruthValuesVector();
// } else {
// phiStates = storm::storage::BitVector(numberOfStates, true);
// psiStates = propositionalChecker.check((*(formulas[0])).asProbabilityOperatorFormula().getSubformula().asEventuallyFormula().getSubformula())->asExplicitQualitativeCheckResult().getTruthValuesVector();
// }
//
// // Get the maybeStates
// std::pair<storm::storage::BitVector, storm::storage::BitVector> statesWithProbability01 = storm::utility::graph::performProb01(this->model.getBackwardTransitions(), phiStates, psiStates);
// storm::storage::BitVector topStates = statesWithProbability01.second;
// storm::storage::BitVector bottomStates = statesWithProbability01.first;
//
// STORM_LOG_THROW(topStates.begin() != topStates.end(), storm::exceptions::NotImplementedException, "Formula yields to no 1 states");
// STORM_LOG_THROW(bottomStates.begin() != bottomStates.end(), storm::exceptions::NotImplementedException, "Formula yields to no zero states");
//
// // Transform to Lattice
// auto matrix = this->model.getTransitionMatrix();
//
// for (uint_fast64_t i = 0; i < numberOfStates; ++i) {
// stateMap[i] = storm::storage::BitVector(numberOfStates, false);
//
// auto row = matrix.getRow(i);
// for (auto rowItr = row.begin(); rowItr != row.end(); ++rowItr) {
// stateMap[i].set(rowItr->getColumn(), true);
// }
// // TODO: allow more than 2 transitions? or fix this in preprocessing?
// STORM_LOG_THROW(stateMap[i].getNumberOfSetBits() <= 2, storm::exceptions::NotSupportedException, "Only two outgoing transitions per state allowed");
// }
//
// // Create the Lattice
// storm::analysis::Lattice *lattice = new storm::analysis::Lattice(topStates, bottomStates, numberOfStates);
// return this->extendLattice(lattice, std::set<storm::expressions::Expression>({}));
// }
//
// template <typename ValueType>
// storm::analysis::Lattice* LatticeExtender<ValueType>::extendLattice(storm::analysis::Lattice* lattice, std::set<storm::expressions::Expression> assumptions) {
// uint_fast64_t numberOfStates = this->model.getNumberOfStates();
//
// storm::storage::BitVector oldStates(numberOfStates);
//
// // Create a copy of the states already present in the lattice.
// storm::storage::BitVector seenStates = lattice->getAddedStates();
//
// while (oldStates != seenStates) {
// // As long as new states are added to the lattice, continue.
// oldStates = storm::storage::BitVector(seenStates);
//
// for (auto stateItr = stateMap.begin(); stateItr != stateMap.end(); ++stateItr) {
// // Iterate over all states
// auto stateNumber = stateItr->first;
// storm::storage::BitVector successors = stateItr->second;
//
// // Check if current state has not been added yet, and all successors have
// bool check = !seenStates[stateNumber];
// for (auto succIndex = successors.getNextSetIndex(0); check && succIndex != numberOfStates; succIndex = successors.getNextSetIndex(++succIndex)) {
// check &= seenStates[succIndex];
// }
//
// if (check && successors.getNumberOfSetBits() == 1) {
// // As there is only one successor the current state and its successor must be at the same nodes.
// lattice->addToNode(stateNumber, lattice->getNode(successors.getNextSetIndex(0)));
// seenStates.set(stateNumber);
// } else if (check && successors.getNumberOfSetBits() > 1) {
// // TODO: allow more than 2 transitions?
//
// // Otherwise, check how the two states compare, and add if the comparison is possible.
// uint_fast64_t successor1 = successors.getNextSetIndex(0);
// uint_fast64_t successor2 = successors.getNextSetIndex(successor1 + 1);
// int compareResult = lattice->compare(successor1, successor2);
// if (compareResult == 1) {
// // successor 1 is closer to top than successor 2
// lattice->addBetween(stateNumber, lattice->getNode(successor1),
// lattice->getNode(successor2));
// } else if (compareResult == 2) {
// // successor 2 is closer to top than successor 1
// lattice->addBetween(stateNumber, lattice->getNode(successor2),
// lattice->getNode(successor1));
// } else if (compareResult == 0) {
// // the successors are at the same level
// lattice->addToNode(stateNumber, lattice->getNode(successor1));
// } else {
// // TODO: create critical pair
// }
// seenStates.set(stateNumber);
// }
// }
// }
// return lattice;
// }
template < typename SparseModelType >
storm : : analysis : : Lattice * LatticeExtender < SparseModelType > : : toLattice ( std : : vector < std : : shared_ptr < storm : : logic : : Formula const > > formulas ) {
STORM_LOG_THROW ( ( + + formulas . begin ( ) ) = = formulas . end ( ) , storm : : exceptions : : NotSupportedException , " Only one formula allowed for monotonicity analysis " ) ;
STORM_LOG_THROW ( ( * ( formulas [ 0 ] ) ) . isProbabilityOperatorFormula ( )
& & ( ( * ( formulas [ 0 ] ) ) . asProbabilityOperatorFormula ( ) . getSubformula ( ) . isUntilFormula ( )
| | ( * ( formulas [ 0 ] ) ) . asProbabilityOperatorFormula ( ) . getSubformula ( ) . isEventuallyFormula ( ) ) , storm : : exceptions : : NotSupportedException , " Expecting until formula " ) ;
uint_fast64_t numberOfStates = this - > model . get ( ) - > getNumberOfStates ( ) ;
storm : : modelchecker : : SparsePropositionalModelChecker < SparseModelType > propositionalChecker ( * model ) ;
storm : : storage : : BitVector phiStates ;
storm : : storage : : BitVector psiStates ;
if ( ( * ( formulas [ 0 ] ) ) . asProbabilityOperatorFormula ( ) . getSubformula ( ) . isUntilFormula ( ) ) {
phiStates = propositionalChecker . check ( ( * ( formulas [ 0 ] ) ) . asProbabilityOperatorFormula ( ) . getSubformula ( ) . asUntilFormula ( ) . getLeftSubformula ( ) ) - > asExplicitQualitativeCheckResult ( ) . getTruthValuesVector ( ) ;
psiStates = propositionalChecker . check ( ( * ( formulas [ 0 ] ) ) . asProbabilityOperatorFormula ( ) . getSubformula ( ) . asUntilFormula ( ) . getRightSubformula ( ) ) - > asExplicitQualitativeCheckResult ( ) . getTruthValuesVector ( ) ;
} else {
phiStates = storm : : storage : : BitVector ( numberOfStates , true ) ;
psiStates = propositionalChecker . check ( ( * ( formulas [ 0 ] ) ) . asProbabilityOperatorFormula ( ) . getSubformula ( ) . asEventuallyFormula ( ) . getSubformula ( ) ) - > asExplicitQualitativeCheckResult ( ) . getTruthValuesVector ( ) ;
}
// Get the maybeStates
std : : pair < storm : : storage : : BitVector , storm : : storage : : BitVector > statesWithProbability01 = storm : : utility : : graph : : performProb01 ( this - > model . get ( ) - > getBackwardTransitions ( ) , phiStates , psiStates ) ;
storm : : storage : : BitVector topStates = statesWithProbability01 . second ;
storm : : storage : : BitVector bottomStates = statesWithProbability01 . first ;
STORM_LOG_THROW ( topStates . begin ( ) ! = topStates . end ( ) , storm : : exceptions : : NotImplementedException , " Formula yields to no 1 states " ) ;
STORM_LOG_THROW ( bottomStates . begin ( ) ! = bottomStates . end ( ) , storm : : exceptions : : NotImplementedException , " Formula yields to no zero states " ) ;
// Transform to Lattice
auto matrix = this - > model . get ( ) - > getTransitionMatrix ( ) ;
for ( uint_fast64_t i = 0 ; i < numberOfStates ; + + i ) {
stateMap [ i ] = storm : : storage : : BitVector ( numberOfStates , false ) ;
auto row = matrix . getRow ( i ) ;
for ( auto rowItr = row . begin ( ) ; rowItr ! = row . end ( ) ; + + rowItr ) {
stateMap [ i ] . set ( rowItr - > getColumn ( ) , true ) ;
}
// TODO: allow more than 2 transitions? or fix this in preprocessing?
STORM_LOG_THROW ( stateMap [ i ] . getNumberOfSetBits ( ) < = 2 , storm : : exceptions : : NotSupportedException , " Only two outgoing transitions per state allowed " ) ;
}
// Create the Lattice
storm : : analysis : : Lattice * lattice = new storm : : analysis : : Lattice ( topStates , bottomStates , numberOfStates ) ;
return this - > extendLattice ( lattice , std : : set < storm : : expressions : : Expression > ( { } ) ) ;
}
template < typename SparseModelType >
storm : : analysis : : Lattice * LatticeExtender < SparseModelType > : : extendLattice ( storm : : analysis : : Lattice * lattice , std : : set < storm : : expressions : : Expression > assumptions ) {
uint_fast64_t numberOfStates = this - > model . get ( ) - > getNumberOfStates ( ) ;
storm : : storage : : BitVector oldStates ( numberOfStates ) ;
// Create a copy of the states already present in the lattice.
storm : : storage : : BitVector seenStates = ( lattice - > getAddedStates ( ) ) ;
while ( oldStates ! = seenStates ) {
// As long as new states are added to the lattice, continue.
oldStates = storm : : storage : : BitVector ( seenStates ) ;
for ( auto stateItr = stateMap . begin ( ) ; stateItr ! = stateMap . end ( ) ; + + stateItr ) {
// Iterate over all states
auto stateNumber = stateItr - > first ;
storm : : storage : : BitVector successors = stateItr - > second ;
// Check if current state has not been added yet, and all successors have
bool check = ! seenStates [ stateNumber ] ;
for ( auto succIndex = successors . getNextSetIndex ( 0 ) ; check & & succIndex ! = numberOfStates ; succIndex = successors . getNextSetIndex ( + + succIndex ) ) {
check & = seenStates [ succIndex ] ;
}
if ( check & & successors . getNumberOfSetBits ( ) = = 1 ) {
// As there is only one successor the current state and its successor must be at the same nodes.
lattice - > addToNode ( stateNumber , lattice - > getNode ( successors . getNextSetIndex ( 0 ) ) ) ;
seenStates . set ( stateNumber ) ;
} else if ( check & & successors . getNumberOfSetBits ( ) > 1 ) {
// TODO: allow more than 2 transitions?
// Otherwise, check how the two states compare, and add if the comparison is possible.
uint_fast64_t successor1 = successors . getNextSetIndex ( 0 ) ;
uint_fast64_t successor2 = successors . getNextSetIndex ( successor1 + 1 ) ;
int compareResult = lattice - > compare ( successor1 , successor2 ) ;
if ( compareResult = = 1 ) {
// successor 1 is closer to top than successor 2
lattice - > addBetween ( stateNumber , lattice - > getNode ( successor1 ) ,
lattice - > getNode ( successor2 ) ) ;
} else if ( compareResult = = 2 ) {
// successor 2 is closer to top than successor 1
lattice - > addBetween ( stateNumber , lattice - > getNode ( successor2 ) ,
lattice - > getNode ( successor1 ) ) ;
} else if ( compareResult = = 0 ) {
// the successors are at the same level
lattice - > addToNode ( stateNumber , lattice - > getNode ( successor1 ) ) ;
} else {
// TODO: create critical pair
}
seenStates . set ( stateNumber ) ;
}
}
}
return lattice ;
}
template class LatticeExtender < storm : : models : : sparse : : Model < storm : : RationalFunction > > ;
// template class LatticeExtender<storm::models::sparse::Mdp<storm::RationalFunction>>;
}
}
}
}