sp
/
tempest
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Browse Source

Fixed a FragmentCheckerTest case which considered a formula that is now considered invalid.

tempestpy_adaptions
Tim Quatmann 4 years ago
committed by Stefan Pranger
parent
aa29ad1196
commit
8c669b9e8b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Whitespace
Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL
Split View
Diff Options
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File
  1. 2
      src/test/storm/logic/FragmentCheckerTest.cpp

2
src/test/storm/logic/FragmentCheckerTest.cpp
View File

@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ TEST(FragmentCheckerTest, MultiObjective) {
ASSERT_NO_THROW(formula = formulaParser.parseSingleFormulaFromString("P=? [F \"label\"]"));
EXPECT_FALSE(checker.conformsToSpecification(*formula, multiobjective));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(formula = formulaParser.parseSingleFormulaFromString("multi(R<0.3 [ C ], P<0.6 [F \"label\"] & \"label\" & R<=4[F \"label\"])"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(formula = formulaParser.parseSingleFormulaFromString("multi(R<0.3 [ C ], P<0.6 [(F \"label1\") & G \"label2\"])"));
EXPECT_FALSE(checker.conformsToSpecification(*formula, multiobjective));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(formula = formulaParser.parseSingleFormulaFromString("Pmax=? [ F multi(R<0.3 [ C ], P<0.6 [F \"label\"] & \"label\" & R<=4[F \"label\"])]"));

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save